Press "Enter" to skip to content

US Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Travel Ban Nationwide


First published: February 4, 2017, 7:24 AM IST | Updated: 8 mins ago

Mazdak Tootkaboni (2nd L) is reunited with friends and family after he was separated from other passengers and questioned as a result of the travel ban, at Logan Airport in Boston, January 28, 2017.(Image: Reuters)

Los Angeles: A federal judge in Seattle on Friday ordered a temporary, nationwide halt to President Donald Trump’s ban on travellers from seven Muslim-majority countries, in the most severe blow to the controversial measure.

The temporary restraining order issued by US District Judge James Robart will remain valid nationwide pending a full review of a complaint by Washington attorney general Bob Ferguson.

Federal judges in several other states have also acted against the ban since it came into effect last Friday but Robart’s ruling is the furthest reaching order so far.

Also Read | More than 100,000 Visas Revoked Amid Trump Travel Ban: Reports

It came after Ferguson filed a suit to invalidate key provisions of Trump’s executive order which bar Syrian refugees indefinitely and blocks citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entry into the US for 90 days. Refugees from countries other than Syria are barred from entry for 120 days.

“The constitution prevailed today,” Ferguson said after the ruling. “No one is above the law — not even the president.”

Washington Governor Jay Inslee welcomed the decision as a “tremendous victory” but warned that the battle to overturn Trump’s executive order was not over.

“There is still more to do,” he said in a statement. “The fight isn’t yet won. But we should feel heartened by today’s victory and more resolute than ever that we are fighting on the right side of history.”

Ferguson argued in his complaint that the president’s ban violated the constitutional rights of immigrants and their families as it specifically targets Muslims.

However, attorneys representing the Trump administration argued that as president, he had broad powers and was within his right to issue an order that protects Americans.

Similar legal challenges against the ban have been made in several other states, including California, New York and Washington.

Source: News18