Since early 2018, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has received more than 300 complaints of sexual and other harassment and removed 75 principal investigators (PIs) from grants as a result, the agency reported this week. That’s the eye-opening result of an update NIH provided on its efforts to address professional misconduct by agency-funded investigators.
About two-thirds of the complaints involved sexual harassment allegations; the agency removed 54 PIs as a result. Before 2018, a PI had never been stripped of a grant for that reason, but in response to the #MeTooSTEM movement, NIH began to encourage sexual harassment victims to file complaints.
The agency’s Office of Extramural Research (OER) also looks into other forms of professional misconduct—including bullying and racial discrimination, which have recently made up a greater share of the complaints (see first table, below), OER Deputy Director Michael Lauer says. He presented the data on the 314 total complaints on 10 June at a meeting of NIH’s Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), noting that some cases involve a combination of these concerns.
The accused scientist’s institution investigated and validated the claims in about 29% of the 163 resolved cases involving sexual harassment alone, and in 22% of “other” complaints, NIH found. (In sexual harassment cases, that often means the institution conducted a Title IX investigation; for discrimination, it might be an investigation by a diversity and inclusion or human resources office, Lauer says.) That substantiation rate is roughly comparable to the 20% of complaints that were validated within NIH’s in-house research program, Lauer noted at the meeting.
Harassment complaints received by NIH
Outcome of cases closed or resolved by NIH
|Sexual harassment||Other harassment*|
|Total cases resolved||163||105|
|Letter of inquiry sent to institution||131||95|
|Allegation substantiated by institution||48||23|
|Principal investigator removed||54||21|
|Principal investigator left institution||50||11|
|Scientist removed from peer review||87||38|
Validating less than one-third of complaints may seem low, but isn’t, given the nature of such investigations, says Alexandra Tracy-Ramirez, an attorney in Colorado with experience in gender discrimination. Some cases don’t result in findings because the behavior did not meet the “severe or pervasive” harassment standard required, Lauer said in an interview with ScienceInsider. In other cases, victims decide to drop the complaint, or complaints don’t hold up. Lauer said he recently reviewed a case in which a female faculty member claimed she did not get a promotion because of gender discrimination. But the university documented to NIH that she had not met academic standards for the new position.
When a university’s investigations result in findings or a settlement, NIH then works with the institution to “remove [the scientist] from the NIH ecosystem” to maintain a safe workplace, Lauer said. NIH removed 75 PIs from grants, and 61 PIs left their institutions.
A larger number of NIH-funded scientists, 125, have been barred from serving as peer reviewers for grants. To avoid bias in peer review, the agency sometimes removes reviewers before an investigation is complete, Lauer explains. “If it turns out that everything is fine, then we can restore the ability to invite them for peer review,” Lauer told the ACD.
With reporting by Mennatalla Ibrahim.
Source: Science Mag