So, Sathyaraj went on record expressing his regret for what he said nine years ago. Nobody, however, questioned why these protesting voices in Karnataka erupted just as a fi lm of Baahubali-2’s scale was set for release. These aren’t isolated cases, mind you. Rajinikanth wanted to go to Sri Lanka to participate in a housing project for Tamilians in Jaffna, and was forced to cancel his plans. Kamal Haasan’s Vishwaroopam-2 is said to be gearing up for release this year but the furore over Vishwaroopam-1 is still fresh in our memory.
He was lectured so much about what he should or should not opine that he fi nally had to remind them of his right to free speech: “Just because you do not approve of what I’m saying does not mean I won’t say it — my opinions are mine just like you have yours.” Icon-bashing has become a phenomenon in India and social media has made it an easy pastime. We are obsessed with our fi lm-stars, and don’t really let them live with their opinions. The slack we cut for our own selves, we refuse to cut for celebrities.
Why? Sathyaraj exercised just caution and expressed regret in his statement last week which will now ensure the release of Baahubali: The Conclusion in Karnataka. But what indeed is the value of a blackmailed apology? Who is playing the class teacher here and trying to bring errant celebrities to book? What joy does anyone derive when they force a fellow citizen, who also lives in a free democratic country, touted to be one of the greatest Republics in this world, to disown what he/she believes in? How does a personal point of view or political affi liation affect your perception of an actor’s professional work? Where is the rationale behind India’s faceless fringe elements targetting an actor only so they can get him to say one word: Sorry.
Source: The New Indian Express